2006 Chrysler Neon vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Neon would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 229 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Neon. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Neon.
Because 2012 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chrysler Neon. (178 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chrysler Neon. 2006 Chrysler Neon has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chrysler Neon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Neon | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Neon | Commodore |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 178 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |