2006 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Pacifica weights approximately 1249 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Chrysler Pacifica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Pacifica | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Chrysler | DAF |
Model | Pacifica | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 666 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 33 L |