2006 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 1982 Ford Cougar
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Cougar would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Pacifica weights approximately 544 kg more than 1982 Ford Cougar.
Because 1982 Ford Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Pacifica | 1982 Ford Cougar | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Pacifica | Cougar |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Body Type | Crossover | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 4186 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2024 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2760 mm |