2006 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 2002 Citroen C3
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica (251 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C3. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Pacifica weights approximately 468 kg more than 2002 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Chrysler Pacifica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Citroen C3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica (339 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C3. (200 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler Pacifica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Pacifica | 2002 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Citroen |
Model | Pacifica | C3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | Crossover | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1152 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 4.3 L/100km |