2006 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Pacifica weights approximately 405 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica (339 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (213 Nm). This means 2006 Chrysler Pacifica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Pacifica | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Pacifica | Outlander |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Crossover | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 213 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 59 L |