2006 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 2007 Ford E-150
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Pacifica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Pacifica would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chrysler Pacifica. (339 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chrysler Pacifica.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Pacifica | 2007 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Pacifica | E-150 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2007 |
Body Type | Crossover | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 132 L |