2006 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Pacifica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Pacifica would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Pacifica weights approximately 565 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 2006 Chrysler Pacifica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica (339 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler Pacifica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler Pacifica | 2008 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Chrysler | Renault |
| Model | Pacifica | Clio |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1390 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 50 L |
