2006 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Pacifica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Pacifica would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica (250 HP) has 183 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2006 Chrysler Pacifica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler Pacifica | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Pacifica | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Crossover | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 67 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2490 mm |
