2006 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 2009 Pontiac Torrent

To start off, 2009 Pontiac Torrent is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Pacifica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Pacifica would be higher. At 3,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Pontiac Torrent (264 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Pacifica. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Pontiac Torrent should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Pacifica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Pacifica weights approximately 291 kg more than 2009 Pontiac Torrent.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 339 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chrysler Pacifica 2009 Pontiac Torrent
Make Chrysler Pontiac
Model Pacifica Torrent
Year Released 2006 2009
Body Type Crossover Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3964 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 250 HP 264 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 339 Nm 339 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2300 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.4:1
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 6 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 1329 kg
Vehicle Length 5060 mm 4820 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1680 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2860 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 10.2 L/100km 9.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.8 L/100km 14.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 12.4 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 87 L 76 L