2006 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Pacifica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Pacifica would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Pacifica. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Pacifica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Pacifica weights approximately 529 kg more than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Because 2006 Chrysler Pacifica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Lotus Evora. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Pacifica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lotus Evora (350 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chrysler Pacifica. (339 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chrysler Pacifica.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Pacifica | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | Pacifica | Evora |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Crossover | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2047 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1229 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2575 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 60 L |