2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 1980 Ford Monarch
To start off, 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,120 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser weights approximately 160 kg more than 1980 Ford Monarch.
Because 1980 Ford Monarch is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Ford Monarch. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 1980 Ford Monarch | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | PT Cruiser | Monarch |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2428 cc | 4120 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2800 mm |