2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe
To start off, 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe would be higher. At 2,148 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser weights approximately 838 kg more than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser (300 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (80 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | |
Make | Chrysler | MCC |
Model | PT Cruiser | Smart & Pulse City Coupe |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2148 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 80 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 63.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 63 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Top Speed | 183 km/hour | 135 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.8 seconds | 17.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1558 kg | 720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 22 L |