2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser (151 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser weights approximately 412 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser (224 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | PT Cruiser | Equator |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2425 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 151 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 224 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3260 mm |
