2006 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1972 Citroen SM
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Citroen SM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Citroen SM would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Sebring (201 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1972 Citroen SM. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1972 Citroen SM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler Sebring (258 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Citroen SM. (231 Nm). This means 2006 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Citroen SM.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler Sebring | 1972 Citroen SM | |
| Make | Chrysler | Citroen |
| Model | Sebring | SM |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2737 cc | 2668 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 180 HP |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 231 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 86.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78.5 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2960 mm |
