2006 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Sebring (201 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 678 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler Sebring (258 Nm @ 4850 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Sebring | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Sebring | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4850 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2210 mm |