2006 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2007 Ford E-250
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Sebring. (150 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Sebring.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chrysler Sebring. (217 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Sebring | 2007 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Sebring | E-250 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2007 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2423 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 132 L |