2006 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 367 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler Sebring (217 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Sebring | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Sebring | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 1390 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 217 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 50 L |