2006 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1966 Marcos 1500
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Marcos 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Marcos 1500 would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Voyager (145 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1966 Marcos 1500. (85 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 1966 Marcos 1500.
Because 1966 Marcos 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Marcos 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Voyager | 1966 Marcos 1500 | |
Make | Chrysler | Marcos |
Model | Voyager | 1500 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 85 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1090 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2290 mm |