2006 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1968 Lotus 49
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus 49. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus 49 would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus 49 (405 HP) has 233 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Voyager. (172 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus 49 should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Voyager.
Because 1968 Lotus 49 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus 49. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chrysler Voyager has automatic transmission and 1968 Lotus 49 has manual transmission. 1968 Lotus 49 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chrysler Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Voyager | 1968 Lotus 49 | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | Voyager | 49 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 3301 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 405 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |