2006 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1978 Mazda RX-3

To start off, 2006 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Voyager (172 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1978 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda RX-3.

Because 1978 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chrysler Voyager 1978 Mazda RX-3
Make Chrysler Mazda
Model Voyager RX-3
Year Released 2006 1978
Body Type Minivan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3301 cc 1963 cc
Engine Type V dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 172 HP 100 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Width 2000 mm 1600 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]