2006 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler Voyager | 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
| Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Voyager | Corniche |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3301 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1840 mm |
