2006 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL

To start off, 2006 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 5,441 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL (494 HP) has 349 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Voyager. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Voyager.

Because 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL has automatic transmission and 2006 Chrysler Voyager has manual transmission. 2006 Chrysler Voyager will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chrysler Voyager 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL
Make Chrysler Mercedes-Benz
Model Voyager SL
Year Released 2006 2002
Body Type Minivan Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2429 cc 5441 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 145 HP 494 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 7 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4850 mm 4540 mm
Vehicle Width 2000 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 3050 mm 2570 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 62 L