2006 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (207 HP) has 62 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Voyager. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Voyager.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chrysler Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Voyager | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Voyager | XC90 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 207 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 72 L |