2006 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2009 Ford Ka

To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford Ka has automatic transmission and 2006 Chrysler Voyager has manual transmission. 2006 Chrysler Voyager will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chrysler Voyager 2009 Ford Ka
Make Chrysler Ford
Model Voyager Ka
Year Released 2006 2009
Body Type Minivan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2499 cc 1297 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 140 HP 0 HP
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 7 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 3660 mm
Vehicle Width 2000 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2450 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]