2006 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (147 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Voyager. (145 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 565 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chrysler Voyager (218 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Voyager | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Voyager | 6 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1999 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 183 km/hour | 212 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |