2006 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2009 Mini Cooper

To start off, 2009 Mini Cooper is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mini Cooper (168 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Voyager. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mini Cooper should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Voyager.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Chrysler Voyager 2009 Mini Cooper
Make Chrysler Mini
Model Voyager Cooper
Year Released 2006 2009
Body Type Minivan Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2429 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 145 HP 168 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4850 mm 3660 mm
Vehicle Width 2000 mm 1420 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1930 mm
Wheelbase Size 3050 mm 2470 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 50 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]