2006 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2010 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Bravo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Fiat Bravo (163 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Voyager. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Voyager.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Voyager | 2010 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Chrysler | Fiat |
Model | Voyager | Bravo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 163 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 57 L |