2006 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 5,935 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage (510 HP) has 365 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Voyager. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Voyager.
Because 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Aston Martin Vantage. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler Voyager | 2013 Aston Martin Vantage | |
| Make | Chrysler | Aston Martin |
| Model | Voyager | Vantage |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 5935 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 510 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4385 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2022 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2601 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 80 L |
