2006 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Compass (170 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Voyager. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Voyager.
Because 2013 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Chrysler Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Chrysler Voyager | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Chrysler | Jeep |
| Model | Voyager | Compass |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 170 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4448 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1811 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1651 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2634 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 51 L |
