2006 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2013 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2013 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volkswagen Eos (197 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Voyager. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Voyager.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Volkswagen Eos has automatic transmission and 2006 Chrysler Voyager has manual transmission. 2006 Chrysler Voyager will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Volkswagen Eos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chrysler Voyager | 2013 Volkswagen Eos | |
Make | Chrysler | Volkswagen |
Model | Voyager | Eos |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1791 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1443 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2578 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 55 L |