2006 Citroen 1.6 vs. 2008 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2008 Volvo XC90 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Citroen 1.6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Citroen 1.6 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volvo XC90 (235 HP) has 127 more horse power than 2006 Citroen 1.6. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen 1.6.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen 1.6. (148 Nm). This means 2008 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen 1.6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen 1.6 | 2008 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | 1.6 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 3199 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 235 HP |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 96 mm |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1900 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 80 L |
