2006 Citroen 1.6 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Citroen 1.6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Citroen 1.6 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2006 Citroen 1.6. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen 1.6.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (181 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen 1.6. (148 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen 1.6.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen 1.6 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | 1.6 | 3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 145 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 181 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 83.1 mm |
Top Speed | 194 km/hour | 203 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.6 seconds | 9.8 seconds |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 10.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |