2006 Citroen 1.6 vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Citroen 1.6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Citroen 1.6 would be higher. At 2,606 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (123 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2006 Citroen 1.6. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen 1.6.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (206 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen 1.6. (148 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen 1.6.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen 1.6 | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | 1.6 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2606 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 206 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |