2006 Citroen 1.6 vs. 2012 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Citroen 1.6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Citroen 1.6 would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Falcon (261 HP) has 153 more horse power than 2006 Citroen 1.6. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen 1.6.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Falcon (391 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen 1.6. (148 Nm). This means 2012 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen 1.6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen 1.6 | 2012 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | 1.6 | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 3983 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 261 HP |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 391 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 92.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 99.3 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1868 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |
