2006 Citroen 1.6 vs. 2013 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2013 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Citroen 1.6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Citroen 1.6 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota 4Runner (266 HP) has 158 more horse power than 2006 Citroen 1.6. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen 1.6.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota 4Runner (377 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen 1.6. (148 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen 1.6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen 1.6 | 2013 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | 1.6 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 4000 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 266 HP |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 377 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 95 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1925 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 87 L |
