2006 Citroen Berlingo vs. 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Citroen Berlingo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Citroen Berlingo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo (119 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2006 Citroen Berlingo. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen Berlingo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo weights approximately 165 kg more than 2006 Citroen Berlingo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen Berlingo | 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo | |
Make | Citroen | Chevrolet |
Model | Berlingo | Rezzo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Panel Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1359 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 119 HP |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 86 mm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1216 kg | 1381 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |