2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1952 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen C2 (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Because 1952 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen C2 | 1952 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | C2 | 12 M |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2500 mm |
