2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1954 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,693 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Talbot Baby (108 HP) has 41 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Talbot Baby weights approximately 655 kg more than 2006 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C2 | 1954 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Citroen | Talbot |
Model | C2 | Baby |
Year Released | 2006 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 2693 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 108 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 3130 mm |