2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1960 Toyota Master RR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen C2 (72 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 220 kg more than 2006 Citroen C2.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen C2 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | C2 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1358 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 75 L |
