2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1963 MG MGB
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG MGB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG MGB would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 MG MGB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 MG MGB (89 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 MG MGB should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen C2 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1963 MG MGB.
Because 1963 MG MGB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 MG MGB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Citroen C2 (150 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 MG MGB. (149 Nm). This means 2006 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 MG MGB.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C2 | 1963 MG MGB | |
Make | Citroen | MG |
Model | C2 | MGB |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1798 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 149 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2320 mm |