2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1968 Renault 4
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,124 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen C2 (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1968 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1968 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen C2 weights approximately 280 kg more than 1968 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C2 | 1968 Renault 4 | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | C2 | 4 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 38 L |