2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Riley Kestrel (64 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen C2 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Riley Kestrel (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (94 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1969 Riley Kestrel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen C2 | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Citroen | Riley |
| Model | C2 | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 94 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 25 L |
