2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1970 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Datsun 240Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Datsun 240Z (151 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Datsun 240Z should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Datsun 240Z weights approximately 138 kg more than 2006 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Datsun 240Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Datsun 240Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Datsun 240Z (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (94 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1970 Datsun 240Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2. 1970 Datsun 240Z has automatic transmission and 2006 Citroen C2 has manual transmission. 2006 Citroen C2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1970 Datsun 240Z will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen C2 | 1970 Datsun 240Z | |
| Make | Citroen | Datsun |
| Model | C2 | 240Z |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1970 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 2393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 151 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 94 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 73.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 158 km/hour | 201 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 16.4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1068 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2300 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
