2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1973 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Datsun 240Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Datsun 240Z (151 HP) has 84 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Datsun 240Z should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Datsun 240Z weights approximately 73 kg more than 2006 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1973 Datsun 240Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Datsun 240Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Datsun 240Z (198 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (150 Nm). This means 1973 Datsun 240Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen C2 | 1973 Datsun 240Z | |
| Make | Citroen | Datsun |
| Model | C2 | 240Z |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1973 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1398 cc | 2393 cc |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 151 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 73.7 mm |
| Top Speed | 166 km/hour | 201 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1068 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2300 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
