2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Volvo 140 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Volvo 140 (95 HP) has 36 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Volvo 140 should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Volvo 140 (147 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (94 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1974 Volvo 140 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C2 | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C2 | 140 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 95 HP |
Torque | 94 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 84.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2620 mm |