2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1978 Mazda 626
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,768 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda 626 (93 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2.
Because 1978 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 150 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C2 | 1978 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C2 | 626 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1768 cc |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 93 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 150 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2520 mm |