2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1979 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,398 cc, 2006 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen C2 (67 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1979 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1979 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen C2 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1979 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Citroen C2 (150 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm). This means 2006 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C2 | 1979 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | Citroen | Seat |
Model | C2 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1197 cc |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 63 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 92 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2460 mm |