2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1980 Suzuki SJ 410
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Suzuki SJ 410. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Suzuki SJ 410 would be higher. At 1,398 cc, 2006 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen C2 (67 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1980 Suzuki SJ 410. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1980 Suzuki SJ 410. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen C2 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1980 Suzuki SJ 410. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Suzuki SJ 410 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Citroen C2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Suzuki SJ 410 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Citroen C2 (150 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Suzuki SJ 410. (74 Nm). This means 2006 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Suzuki SJ 410.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen C2 | 1980 Suzuki SJ 410 | |
| Make | Citroen | Suzuki |
| Model | C2 | SJ 410 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1398 cc | 970 cc |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 44 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 870 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2040 mm |
