2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1981 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Seat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Seat Ritmo (63 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Seat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen C2 weights approximately 48 kg more than 1981 Seat Ritmo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Citroen C2 (94 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Citroen C2 | 1981 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | Citroen | Seat |
Model | C2 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 882 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2460 mm |