2006 Citroen C2 vs. 1983 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen C2 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1983 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1983 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Citroen C2 | 1983 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
| Model | C2 | XJR |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 5343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 90 L |
